|
| Author |
Message |
speedbunch
|
Post subject: Dyno Queens of MHM Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 10:10 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 5:29 pm Posts: 561 Location: willard, Utah Highscores: 5 |
|
|
|
Dyno Queens of MHM
please post up hp & tq
place of dyno
type of dyno
car
Most power on paper
1. Speedbunch----------dynomite, 684hp 705tq 2. Syclone50------------dynojet, 659hp 689tq 3. 19coba93-------------dynomite, 584hp 490tq 4. Dex-------------------dynomite, 582hp 580tq 5. Purevenom-------------dynojet, 580hp 640tq 6. BadStspony-----------mustang, 547hp 565tq 7. Triple Black 281------dynomite, 481hp 450tq 8. 96slowbra-------------dynomite, 440hp 379tq
89 turbo notch 684hp 705tq 14psi
10.9 128mph 9psi
79 pace car project
92 bimini lx<wifes
Last edited by speedbunch on Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:33 pm, edited 9 times in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Triple Black 281
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:17 am |
|
 |
| turbocharged |
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 12:57 pm Posts: 187 Location: Rivendale |
|
|
|
481hp 450 tq
Element Racing
dynomite dyno
Supercharged Mustang GT 12psi (new numbers with new setup soon)
1996 S281 "Darkness"
"so is the thing suppose to spin on its own?"
Last edited by Triple Black 281 on Wed May 14, 2008 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
purevenom
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:21 am |
|
 |
| turbocharged |
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 10:02 pm Posts: 159 Location: Roy, UT |
|
|
|
465 hp 565 tq
Element Racing
Dynomite
1997 Turbo Cobra 15psi
1997 Cobra
11.19 @ 125 on a stock T-45 and stock clutch
Killer of Stock Parts
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
COBRA MAN OF UTAH
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:07 pm |
|
| noob |
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:43 pm Posts: 5 |
|
|
|
WHY ISN"T THE HOST NUMBER #1 LOL.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
BadSTSpony
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:10 am |
|
| noob |
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:47 am Posts: 11 |
|
|
COBRA MAN OF UTAH wrote: WHY ISN"T THE HOST NUMBER #1 LOL.
Yeah....what he said!
Guess you could slap me on the list since that is all my car ever was and will be.
547rwhp
565tq
Mustang dyno
around 12-15 #'s of boost...can't remember for sure.
Might be able to get one more dyno run before I kiss it's ass goodbye (hopefully)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
speedbunch
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 7:33 am |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 5:29 pm Posts: 561 Location: willard, Utah Highscores: 5 |
|
|
BadSTSpony wrote: COBRA MAN OF UTAH wrote: WHY ISN"T THE HOST NUMBER #1 LOL. Yeah....what he said!
ya your right waldo added.
fyi
357w s400 turbo dynomite 684hp 705tq
89 turbo notch 684hp 705tq 14psi
10.9 128mph 9psi
79 pace car project
92 bimini lx<wifes
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
97_Cobra
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 1:24 pm |
|
 |
| supercharged |
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 10:36 pm Posts: 87 |
|
|
|
no offense meant hear but one would think an accurate dyno would like to be used.
obviously dustins car is WAY off weighing 3600lbs and trapping at 124...
"I HAVE RACED MORE *@!!@ TIMES THEN U HAVE HP U STUPID $%!!" -ala cmou
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
speedbunch
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 5:20 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 5:29 pm Posts: 561 Location: willard, Utah Highscores: 5 |
|
|
|
Id love to see him dyno on another dyno also. and compare his numbers.
I know that syclone50 dynoed at heaths dyno last year and element and the numbers were within 10 of eachother.
89 turbo notch 684hp 705tq 14psi
10.9 128mph 9psi
79 pace car project
92 bimini lx<wifes
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
97_Cobra
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:29 pm |
|
 |
| supercharged |
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 10:36 pm Posts: 87 |
|
|
|
that should then show how inaccurate element can be. super accurate on some and nowhere near accurate on others. the only reason its super accurate on some is perhaps its just luck on its erratic behavior.
"I HAVE RACED MORE *@!!@ TIMES THEN U HAVE HP U STUPID $%!!" -ala cmou
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
speedbunch
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 2:02 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 5:29 pm Posts: 561 Location: willard, Utah Highscores: 5 |
|
|
97_Cobra wrote: that should then show how inaccurate element can be. super accurate on some and nowhere near accurate on others. the only reason its super accurate on some is perhaps its just luck on its erratic behavior.
not sure what you mean I would think that element is very accurate and very compable with other dynos.
if you look at dustins tq numbers i think that it reflects his car very well but that might just be me.
89 turbo notch 684hp 705tq 14psi
10.9 128mph 9psi
79 pace car project
92 bimini lx<wifes
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
syclone50
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 3:39 pm |
|
 |
| Admin/mod |
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:34 am Posts: 66 Location: Roy, Ut Highscores: 9 |
|
|
|
Why would element not be accurate!?!?! Every stock to lightly modified car put down EXACTLY what you would expect. What I mean is cars like Sam and Benny's put down numbers you would expect with the mods they have. They were very predictable as everyone was betting what numbers they would make as they were strapping it down.
Jerom does nothing with the dyno but strap it down and go. The roller weighs 2000lbs and never chages. On the other hand the last time I was at Heaths shop he had my 3960lb car on the dyno but on the computer he had it showing 3250lbs!?!?!
With what Brady stated, I dynoed at Heaths and Jeroms in the same day with my 95 mustang and they were with in 10hp.....go figure.
There are too many factors involved in comparing two dynos. I think the only thing you can do is continue to use the SAME dyno after making chages to your setup.
Hellion 03 Cobra
Powered by Evil
Run by Good
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
COBRA MAN OF UTAH
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 4:10 pm |
|
| noob |
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:43 pm Posts: 5 |
|
|
|
ONLY FACTOR I NEED TO KNOW IS THAT IT TAKES MORE THEN 465RWHP TO PROPEL A 3500LBS MUSTANG TO 123MPH TRAPS IN THE STATE A UTAH.
WITH THAT DYNO ITS HIT OR MISS FACT.
HAD A FRIEND A MINE IN A BLACK LS1 EVERY BOLT ON BEST CAM U CAN BUY GOOD TUNE THE WORKS AUTO PUT DOWN BARELY 317RWHP. THEN ON THE SPRAY MADE 430RWHP.
THIS SAME CAMARO HAS BEAT CARS THAT HAVE MADE 600RWHP AND TRAPPED OVER 120MPH AT RMR AND THOSE CARS WERE NOT MUCH OF A PROBLEM FOR HIM TO BEAT EVEN A FEW ON A ROLL.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
BlackNotch
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 5:17 pm |
|
 |
| noob |
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 10:56 am Posts: 25 Location: West Jordan, UT |
|
|
|
I think people are ignoring the torque numbers on Dustin's car. IMO torque numbers have more to do with a 1/4 mile pass than HP numbers do. Look at some 12 second or faster diesel trucks for example. A 12 second dodge can be over 7000lbs make 400-500 horse and over 1000 lbs of torque.
'87 Black Notch, 9 second suspension, 16 second power!
'00 Cummins
'07 Yamaha YFZ471 Stroker
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
96slowbra
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:10 pm |
|
 |
| turbocharged |
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:02 pm Posts: 108 Location: layton, ut |
|
|
|
440rwhp @ 6100rpm
379tq
at our last dyno day
'04 Comp Orange
#96 of 3768
'91 Notch (the beat brady's a$$ project)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
19cobra93
|
Post subject: Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 11:17 am |
|
 |
| supercharged |
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 11:19 am Posts: 97 Location: Clinton |
|
|
|
I agree, it has everything to do with torque. HP is just a math figure, torque is what gets you down the track.
FWIW, when Dustin ran at the track he was seeing a little more boost, and at the track or on the street there is a greater load on the engine which will help keep the turbo spooled. He did say that on the dyno the boost dropped off 3 or 4 pounds. On the dyno he was probably seeing full boost at peak torque (3500-4000 rpm), and by peak hp (5500-6000) his boost had fallen off which would explain the high tq, and low hp numbers. I'll bet on the track the boost didn't fall off like that. Combine that with another pound or two of overall boost and it all makes sense.
2005 Mustang GT 1985 ASC McLaren Capri
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
|